In yesterday’s Monday Motivation, a Monday email sent to subscribers to our eNewsletter The Customer Conversation (link no longer active), we spoke about Walter Mischel’s famous experiment on self control and delayed gratification in children. Here is part of the email:
Researcher Walter Mischel at Stanford devised an ingenious experience back in the Sixties to test self control and the ability to delay gratification in children. He put a marshmallow in front of a child and told them they could either eat the marshmallow or wait up to 20 minutes and then get two marshmallows. Most kids couldn’t do it.
However, a few could, and the researchers found something interesting about those who could: later in life, they seemed more successful, across every metric measured, than those who could not delay gratification. Those who gave in quickly…
In Mischel’s study, those who could delay gratification, got higher rewards in the end. Unfortunately, frontline service reps take the one, easy marshmallow too often and cost organizations and themselves the two marshmallows that would follow from delaying gratification.
In customer service, this dynamic occurs in a number of ways. For instance, it is practiced by the frontline rep who…
In customer service, easy marshmallows are all around. It’s easy to offer an apology and a sincere word to get you through the moment, without putting forth the effort to uncover issues beneath the surface or (in an act requiring even more self discipline) attempting to preempt or forward resolve future issues.
What can organizational leaders do to encourage two-marshmallow thinking?
First, encourage reps to ask open-ended questions, to care about understanding the customer and not just resolving the issue at hand.
Second, make sure operational metrics are not encouraging one-marshmallow thinking. For example, a call center that blindly focuses on first contact resolution to the exclusion of everything else will generally discourage any attempt to uncover other issues or to try to preempt future issues. The drive to check the “resolved” box is too strong.
In customer service, it’s always easiest to eat the marshmallow on the table in front of us; it’s just rarely the way to get the biggest payoff.
Comments have been closed on this post.
© 2011-2023 CTS Service Solutions, LLC.
All rights reserved.
Legal Information | Privacy Policy
How to Cite this Site
I was familiar with the experiment, but I really like how you tied it to customer service. “Two Marshmallow Thinking” will stick with me!
Thanks Jeff. Hopefully, we can get more two-marshmallow thinking in customer service!